Guggenheim Museum Exhibitions The Collection Education Museum Store Membership Visit Us Search
1860-1869
1870-1879
1880-1889
1890-1899
1900-1909
1910-1919
1920-1929
1930-1939
1940-1949
1950-1959
1960-1969
1970-1979
1980-1989
1990-1999
2000-2009
SEARCH
Shortcut Help
Full search
DIRECTORIES
Artist Movement
Title Medium
Date Concept
Museum
<Previous 1910-1919 work Next 1910-1919 work>
Sea=Dancer
Enlarge
Gino Severini, Sea=Dancer (Mare=Ballerina), January 1914. Oil on canvas, with artist's painted frame, Frame: 41 1/2 x 33 13/16 inches; Canvas: 39 3/8 x 31 11/16 inches. Peggy Guggenheim Collection. 76.2553.32. Gino Severini © 2007 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris.




Toward the end of 1913, after he left Paris for Pienza and Rome, Gino Severini traveled to coastal Anzio for reasons of health. It was after arriving there that he executed Sea=Dancer. This painting, in which the sea and a figure are equated, illustrates his notions of “plastic analogies” as outlined in a manifesto he prepared for his solo exhibition at the Marlborough Gallery in London in 1913. According to Severini, the environment is optically determined and hence fluid, and the human figure is merely a part, albeit an inseparable part, of that metamorphic reality. In this canvas and others the cadences of the swirling motion of the dance and the dancer’s costume are compared with those of the sea’s movement. The large curling planes are stippled with brilliant staccato dabs of paint that cause all surfaces to vibrate as if with light. As in many other Futurist paintings, the image spills over onto the frame. The divisionist brushstroke derives from Giacomo Balla and ultimately from the Neo-Impressionists, particularly Georges Seurat. Works such as Sea=Dancer may have a specific source in Seurat’s Le Chahut of 1889–90 (Collection Rijksmuseum Kröller-Müller, Otterlo).1

The play of cylindrical and flat planes in this painting brings to mind the contemporaneous Cubism [more] of Fernand Léger, though the color is closer to the prismatic hues of Robert Delaunay. However, the absence of outline and the dissolution of volume distinguish Severini’s work. During this period Severini’s analogies of forms divest objects of their usual identities; later in 1914 he would produce entirely non-objective compositions.

Lucy Flint

1. A. Barr, Cubism and Abstract Art, exh. cat., New York, 1936, p. 58.